Environmental law is responsible for safeguarding the legal relationship between humans and their respective use of natural resources to satisfy human needs while conserving resources for future use, achieving a balanced interaction to ensure both the environment and the human life.
Nowadays, our Constitution does not include a chapter about environmental safeguards; however, in the chapter of social rights and guarantees, it is discussed in its first article (Article 50) which states the role of government of ensuring a healthy environment. Anyways, there have been people who believe that Article fifty by itself is not enough to regulate a huge topic like the environment. Therefore, during the government of Abel Pacheco de la Espriella, the idea of creating an amendment to the current Constitution was really discussed. It would add one more title, which would be exclusively for ecological conservation, not only to improve and promote greater respect for natural resources, but also, it would make Costa Rica the first country worldwide to include environmental safeguards to its constitution.
After the reading of the articles included in that law, I can conclude that the current fiftieth article of the constitution includes most of the concepts that that law wanted to implement in seven more articles, so it would be unnecessary, coupled with the weak wording of articles which far to produce a profit, would be incurred in political danger because of the vulnerability it can cause. It seems that the inclusion of the new title would not bring much help, considering that not even the only current article is fully respected, therefore, it takes more importance to ensure compliance with the existing article, instead of creating new addition to not fill the expectations, they would not be respected.
After the reading of the articles included in that law, I can conclude that the current fiftieth article of the constitution includes most of the concepts that that law wanted to implement in seven more articles, so it would be unnecessary, coupled that wording of articles is very weak; so, far to produce a profit, would be incurred in political danger because of the vulnerability it can cause. It seems that the inclusion of the new title would not bring much help, considering that not even the only current article is fully respected, therefore, it takes more importance to ensure compliance with the existing article, instead of creating new addition that would not even fulfill the expectations, they would not be respected.
Every citizen should make conscience, and take care of the environment from inside. Also, people must sue if they know that something irregular is happening. Environmental law is growing in our country, and we should start using this tool to our own benefit. Environmental law must improve, but the environment does not depend only on laws, it should be a popular worry, and a common fight. The world is in our hands, and this is a codependence, we need it, it needs us.
Written by: Silvia Chacon
Written by: Silvia Chacon



